Qualitative methods assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

qualitative methods assignment - Essay ExampleFindings presented or conceptualised in a way that offers new insights/ turnnative slipway of thinking Discussion of limitations of evidence and what remains unknown/un come about or what further information/ investigate is neededThe authors has exhibit a deeper companionship and understanding on the topic that they ar studying with. They were qualified to mapped out evidences and supported by literatures of previous studies and theories. The main goal of the study is to have a clear comparison between the content and the quantity competitive and organizational stressors in elite athletes. The limit of the discussions was clear stated that the validated statements shall focus on the stress relating to sports, personal and other matters were not considered. FINDINGSa) Appraisal Questionsb) note indicators (possible features for consideration)c) Notes on study being appraised3How well does the evaluation address its original aims and mean disentangle statement of study aims and objectives reasons for any changes in objectivesFindings clearly linked to the enjoyments of the study - and to the initiative or indemnity being studiedSummary or conclusions directed towards aims of study Discussion of limitations of study in see aims (e.g. are there limitations because of restricted access to study settings or participants, gaps in the sample coverage, missed or unresolved areas of questioning incomplete analysis time constraints)The aims of the study were consistent and there were no reasons to bowdlerise it at the end. Findings were clearly based on the aims of the study and it clearly nailed down the very core purpose of the study. The concluding statements were clearly cited from the introduction, where aims and purpose... Furthermore, the strong statements in the results were based from previous studies and related literature, which was the cornerstone in their brilliant conclusions. Although evidence were n ot fully utilized and presented, the literatures made it credible.Credible/clear discussion of how findings have contributed to knowledge and understanding (e.g. of the insurance policy, programme or theory being reviewed) might be applied to new policy developments, practice or theoryThe authors has exhibit a deeper knowledge and understanding on the topic that they are studying with. They were able to mapped out evidences and supported by literatures of previous studies and theories.Discussion of limitations of study in collision aims (e.g. are there limitations because of restricted access to study settings or participants, gaps in the sample coverage, missed or unresolved areas of questioning incomplete analysis time constraints)The aims of the study were consistent and there were no reasons to alter it at the end. Findings were clearly based on the aims of the study and it clearly nailed down the very core purpose of the study.The concluding statements were clearly cited from the introduction, where aims and purpose of the study was introduced. Thus, the questions and uncertainties on the preliminaries were clearly answered and re-stated in the conclusions.The samples were taken from